Cart 0

๐—” ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„๐˜€ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐—”๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—š๐—ผ ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ.

Tucker Carlson recently took a largely unprecedented swipe at his own network for their recent behavior in what was a far-reaching, epic post-election monologue.

In one recent Fox News example,ย Chris Wallace actually got incensedย that Ted Cruz wouldnโ€™t call Joe Biden โ€œpresident-elect,โ€ a made-up office that doesnโ€™t even exist, much less is it a viable term before the electors cast their votes. Tucker nails that attitude to the wall, noting that it is not his networkโ€™s job, nor the job of any news outlet, to ignore legitimate questions from citizens or to declare them improper and unclean. ย 

Tucker didnโ€™t stop there though. ย He goes into detail about the voter fraud that we know happened, whatโ€™s been admitted, and why itโ€™s perfectly acceptable to expose audiences to that information. He also touches on why so many Americans feel angst about how the process is playing out.

But Tucker also does something that far too many people on both ends of the spectrum wonโ€™t do, and thatโ€™s be honest. He admits that we simply donโ€™t know yet how deep the fraud goes. Was it actually enough to flip all these states in question? I may feel like thatโ€™s the case, and no doubt things are sketchy, but anyone claiming a definitive answer on that is telling you what you want to hear, not whatโ€™s been fully evidenced and litigated.

Yet, thatโ€™s exactly why asking questions and allowing the legal process to play out is so proper. Fox Newsโ€™ hard news division attempting to suppress charges of fraud is not only unconscionable from the standpoint of spitting in its supportersโ€™ faces, itโ€™s completely improper given the facts on the ground. Let the process play out. Thatโ€™s precisely what an unbiased news media would be encouraging.


Older Post Newer Post